For People with Certain BRCA Mutations, Activating the Immune System Could Be Promising Treatment

Share
Print
Physician-scientists Nadeem Riaz (left), Timothy Chan (middle), and Jorge Reis-Filho

Physician-scientists Nadeem Riaz (left), Timothy Chan (middle), and Jorge Reis-Filho

Treatments that harness the immune system to fight cancer have greatly improved outcomes for some people with cancer. Scientists are learning more about why some people respond much better than others to these drugs.

One major factor is something called tumor mutation burden (TMB) — the number of DNA changes a tumor has. Studies from researcher Timothy Chan at Memorial Sloan Kettering and others have shown that tumors with high TMB tend to respond better to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) for the treatment of tumors with a type of genetic defect called mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency.

Checkpoint inhibitors work by releasing a natural brake on your immune system so that immune cells called T cells recognize and attack tumors.

MMR is one of several DNA repair pathways that cells use to fix mistakes in DNA. Mutations in this pathway lead to faulty DNA repair and therefore to higher TMB. Next to MMR, the most commonly mutated DNA repair pathway is called homologous recombination, which repairs double-strand breaks in DNA (in other words, when both of sides of the DNA “ladder” are broken). The cancer-predisposition genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 belong to this pathway. When they are mutated, DNA damage accumulates and one’s risk increases for developing several types of cancer, including breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers.

Scientists at MSK are now reporting that mutations in one BRCA gene, but not the other, produce tumors that respond well to immunotherapy.

“When we started this work, we assumed that tumors with both types of homologous recombination deficiency would respond to immunotherapy based on having a high mutation burden,” says physician-scientist Nadeem Riaz. “But we found instead that BRCA2-mutated tumors responded much better than BRCA1 tumors.”

The unexpected results, which were published November 16 in the journal Nature Cancer, may have implications for the types of treatments that people with BRCA2 mutations should consider.

A Striking Divergence

The researchers made their discoveries using both human data and mouse models. When they compared tumor mutations and clinical information from patients treated with immunotherapy at MSK, they found a direct correlation between mutations in BRCA2 and better survival after treatment.

To confirm that this correlation was more than simply a chance finding, they created genetically engineered mouse models of BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutant breast and colorectal cancers. In both cases, they found that only the BRCA2-mutant tumors responded to treatment with checkpoint inhibitors.

The Science Behind the FDA’s Approval of an Immunotherapy for Mismatch Repair–Deficient Cancers
A new paper from MSK physician-scientist Luis Diaz presents the evidence on which the FDA approved the immunotherapy drug pembrolizumab for cancers with a specific genetic abnormality.

In addition to being surprising, the results were a bit counterintuitive.

“Five years ago, people would’ve probably thought BRCA1 was going to be the more immunogenic tumor,” Dr. Riaz says. “That’s because of the two types, BRCA1-mutant tumors tend to have higher number of immune cells inside them. You might expect that having more immune cells would mean a better response to immunotherapy. But in fact, it was the BRCA2-mutant tumors that showed the better response.”

If BRCA1 and BRCA2 are both involved in homologous recombination, and both lead to higher TMB, why is it only the BRCA2-mutants that seem to respond to immunotherapy?

According to the study authors, it may have to do with the type of mutations that each produces. Mutant BRCA2 produces more small deletions in the DNA sequence — removing one DNA base “letter,” of example. These mutations shift the reading frame of genes and change how the DNA sequence is translated into protein. Imagine the gene is a sentence that reads: “I like chocolate ice cream.” A deletion of one DNA letter might change the sentence to read: “I likc hocolatei cec ream.” The immune system senses these misspelled proteins as foreign and attacks cells containing them. By contrast, BRCA1 creates different types of mutations, which are not as readily detected by the immune system.

Sometimes we think that we know the biology and know what to expect, but when we investigate in detail using the right tools, the results surprise us.
Jorge S. Reis-Filho

Jorge Reis-Filho, a physician-scientist in MSK’s Department of Pathology and a collaborator on the Nature Cancer study, says the results underscore the importance of testing assumptions. “Sometimes we think that we know the biology and know what to expect, but when we investigate in detail using the right tools, the results surprise us,” he says.

“Often it’s not what we don’t know that get us in trouble, it’s the things that we think we know for sure that can lead us astray,” he adds.

Back to top

Making Treatments More Precise

The new publication is an example of the type of work being pursued by the Precision Radiation Oncology Initiative, which Dr. Riaz leads. Created by the Chair of MSK’s Radiation Oncology Department, Simon Powell, the Initiative is geared toward making radiation a type of targeted therapy when used in combination with other treatments such as immunotherapy. Because radiation damages DNA and forces cells to use their DNA repair pathways to fix the damage, the DNA repair defects that cancer cells often have can be exploited against them.

While these new findings need to be confirmed by others and validated in clinical trials, they do suggest that people with BRCA2-mutant tumors may wish to consider enrolling in clinical trials of immunotherapy. Several trials are currently enrolling people with BRCA-mutant cancers.

Robert Samstein, a former radiation oncology at MSK who is now a faculty member at Mount Sinai, is the paper’s first author. Dr. Chan is now director of the Center for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology at Cleveland Clinic.

Back to top

This study was funded in part through the National Institutes of Health (Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748, R01 CA205426, R35 CA232097, and U54OD020355), the Pershing Square Sohn Foundation, PaineWebber, Stand Up 2 Cancer, the STARR Cancer Consortium, AACR Translational Immunology, NIH Director’s Early Independence Award (DP5-OD028171), Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Precision Immunotherapy Kidney Cancer Fund, and the Frederick Adler Fund. MSK has licensed the use of TMB for the identification of patients who benefit from immune checkpoint therapy to PGDx. Dr. Chan is a co-founder of Gritstone Oncology and holds equity in An2H and acknowledges grant funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Illumina, Pfizer, An2H, and Eisai. Dr. Reis-Filho reports personal/consultancy fees from Goldman Sachs and membership of the advisory boards of VolitionRx, Page.AI, Invicro, Roche, Genentech, and Ventana, outside the submitted work. Dr. Riaz has received research funding from BMS, Pfizer, and REPARE Therapeutics and has served as an ad hoc consultant to Illumina, REPARE Therapeutics, and Mirati Therapeutics.